Exhibit B is this shoe from Bebe:
A costs around $2000.
B costs around $150.
Is B the look for less, or less of a look?
(I saw both of them *in person* in Chicago, where Bebe on Oak is just around the corner from LV on Michigan.)
Saturday, March 28, 2009
The Look for Less, or Less of a Look?
Exhibit A is this LV shoe, with photo from Jak & Jil:
Exhibit B is this shoe from Bebe:
A costs around $2000.
B costs around $150.
Is B the look for less, or less of a look?
(I saw both of them *in person* in Chicago, where Bebe on Oak is just around the corner from LV on Michigan.)
Exhibit B is this shoe from Bebe:
A costs around $2000.
B costs around $150.
Is B the look for less, or less of a look?
(I saw both of them *in person* in Chicago, where Bebe on Oak is just around the corner from LV on Michigan.)
This shoe is so over-photographed that any ersatz version is going to look cheap. I'd say go for the original or forego it altogether.
ReplyDeleteI can't say I'd pay $150 for either of these...
ReplyDelete