Saturday, March 28, 2009

The Look for Less, or Less of a Look?

Exhibit A is this LV shoe, with photo from Jak & Jil:

Exhibit B is this shoe from Bebe:

A costs around $2000.

B costs around $150.

Is B the look for less, or less of a look?

(I saw both of them *in person* in Chicago, where Bebe on Oak is just around the corner from LV on Michigan.)


Thumbelina Fashionista said...

This shoe is so over-photographed that any ersatz version is going to look cheap. I'd say go for the original or forego it altogether.

K.Line said...

I can't say I'd pay $150 for either of these...